I’m FINALLY strong enough and mentally stable enough,
(allegedly), to sit up and write for an hour or so. I’m going to attempt to
resume my blogging duties today so the Guru can stop depriving his millions of
fans of those pearls of wisdom that only the Guru can cast in his oh-so Guruish
way.
This is an article that I started right before I caught
malaria, and then typhoid fever and then salmonella and then a urinary
infection all in the last 16 days. It is an article that I hope has some
positive impact on the industry as a whole but I also hope it finally gives
some honest to goodness advice on how to locate people in the SEO industry that
can actually help you reach specific goals. You CAN find the right people that
can help you at almost any price range and it’s not nearly as big a deal as has
been reported over and over again.
Over the last 11 years I’ve probably read 100 or so fluff
pieces with titles like How TO Pick An SEO. Articles that were written with
little fore-thought, factual data or anything resembling a logical conclusion
having to do with helping you choose a competent SEO. The vast majority I’ve
simply chose to ignore and not speak out figuring the blind leading the blind
had little impact on the real world anyway. BUT, last month I ran across an
article that was published by a well known blogger under the corporate flag of
a highly visible, prominent company in the online promotion industry. A company
that, supposedly, is on the same side of SEO or at least in a tightly woven
symbiotic relationship that obviously capitalizes and benefits from the
popularity of SEO.
This is a company that has the eyes of the online
promotional world upon them. A company whose words carry real weight and has an
impact on not only their own readers, (which number in the thousands), but on
an entire industry as well. A company
who has worked hard to establish a reputation within the industry and well
deserves it I might add. But with that reputation comes a responsibility to
hold itself to a higher standard of professional journalism.
Because of this, the Guru feels he must speak out. Even
knowing that it will not likely make him any friends within an organization
that, as I said, has a reputation and is a leader within the Guru’s chosen
field of endeavor. The Guru can only hope that the bitch slapping about to be
given is taken in the spirit that is given, and that the slappee can see the
slapper is wanting only to remind the slappee of their power and influence and
to encourage them to raise their own bar and try to do better.
And so the slapping of the bitch persuasion begins.
The article I’m referring to is titled 8 Tips for
Avoiding an SEO Fraudster located at http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/thoughts-about-seo.html
Immediately the title rubs me the wrong way because
regardless of what the actual intent is, it is not very flattering to ANY SEO.
The Guru has seen so many of these link bait titles that it is not the title
itself that bothers him as much as the fact that is being published by the
Marketing Pilgrim whom the Guru has come to expect more from. That entices me
to continue reading when ordinarily I would have just walked away.
I will address and give a 4 star bitch slap to each of the 8
tips.
>
1. The SEO industry is full of consultants that
are either incompetent or crooked. How many? I would guess well over 90%. As a
result, there is an unbelievable amount of noise in the industry that makes it
almost impossible to actually get to the truth. If you want to hire an SEO
consultant or contract out your SEO, I feel for you. We as a rule do not do
that, so I really cannot make any good recommendations. We have hired for short
periods of time some of the top names in the industry, but have in general,
been disappointed.<
Ok, first I’m thinking if you can’t make any good
recommendations, how in the hell do you think this is a #1 tip to avoiding a
fraudster????
But beyond that, the whole 90% thing is not only pure
unfounded conjecture I find it offensive and
you could not be more wrong. You are referring to a lot of people that
over the last 11 years I’ve had the pleasure and honor to work with, work for
or partner with. I have not hired a lot of top names, I’ve worked with them,
partied with them and consider them good friends and I guarantee you that you
have it ass-backwards. 90% of people in the SEO industry are smart,
experienced, honest and hard working. If you tell them what you want and they
can deliver they will! If they can’t they will tell you that too and probably
recommend someone that can and they are right and anyone would be wise to
listen and take their advice.
>2. It goes without saying that some of the most visible
people in the SEO industry are not visible because they really understand SEO
but because they are good at marketing themselves. Be wary of any information
you read.<
It goes without saying??? :0 Be wary of ANY information you
read???
c’mon, does
this really sound like a tip to you?
How would you feel if you asked me for help and my advice was to be wary of
ANY information you read? My guess is you’d feel like I didn’t know what I was
talking about.
Again, the whole, “most people are visible because they are
good at marketing themselves”, thing is unfounded, without any reference data
whatsoever and simply wrong. Most people visible in the industry are visible
EXACTLY because they know what they are doing, they are in the trenches
everyday and the other people in the trenches recognize this fact. Besides, if
you want something that goes without saying, how about anyone good at marketing
themselves should be good at marketing someone else under similar circumstances?
>3. There ARE real SEO experts out there. However, as a
rule, they are not sharing their secrets because they are applying them to
their own sites and making enormous amounts of money doing it.
Again, how is this a tip for avoiding a fraudster? You do
agree that there are expert SEO’s but you’re implying that they are so crooked
that if you paid them to consult with you they would take your money and cheat
you by not telling you the REAL scoop. This is not true. The vast majority of
SEO’s I know will tell you EXACTLY what you ask them about and they will tell
you the truth. The problem usually comes when they don’t tell you what you want
to hear but that is not the same thing.
As for not sharing, again that is wrong. I can easily name
dozens of blogs and newsletters written by people who do know and share far
more than they need to. The Guru is doing it right now and John Andrews
immediately leaps to mind as another person who is telling you so many secrets
even I am often surprised. But he is not telling you how to stuff meta tags, he
is telling you the real stuff but you have to be willing to listen and see the
value of the secrets he is revealing. That is the tricky part.
Finally, the enormous amounts of money thing. #1, how much
is enormous, #2 how do you know they make that much and #3 how is that a tip to
help me avoid a fraudster? It sounds to me more like jealous bitching than a
desire to steer your readers down the path to succesful online marketing.
>4. An SEO expert in 2001 is not necessarily an expert in
2007. In the early years, there were very simple formulas that would
practically guarantee top rankings. Many SEO “experts” came out of that era and
have no clue how to generate rankings in today’s world. When interviewing SEO
consultants, make sure and ask for their current success stories.<
I was there in those early years and maybe it wasn’t as
complex as it is now but it was still hard work and a LOT
of people coming in fast all wanting your spots. There was never any guarantee
of top rankings and you saying there was just indicates a possible reason you
have been struggling as of late.
Again, the “many experts thing having no clue” is totally
unsubstantiated and without merit, (not to mention more than a little offensive
to all SEO’s). Logic would dictate that in any profession there are changes and
if any professional does not stay abreast of those changes he will cease to be
considered an expert. My contention is that if someone is still generating
revenue either for themselves or for clients, he is still very capable of
providing positive results through consulting or through providing services
directly.
I have no problem with asking for current success stories
but I also feel this is a very poor excuse for a “tip”. I can show you a LOT of
success but that does not mean you will be successful.
>5. When you talk to an SEO consultant and he/she seems
focused on specific little things on your site such as keyword density, meta
tags, etc., move on. If he/she seems overly focused on inbound links, move on.
If he/she is focused on implementing a strategy that makes people want to come
to your site and stay there, you may have found one of the few SEO experts that
know what they are talking about.<
Ok, no slap du Guru for this one. This is one that I agree
could be considered a tip.
I think it lacks much real substance but I do think it is
the closest thing so far to providing some value.
>6. A good SEO strategy predicts where the search engines
are going and moves a web site in that direction. It is obvious that search
engines are getting smarter and will continue to do so. At some point, search
results are going to be very relevant. That means that you need to make your
site as relevant as possible if you want consistent rankings in the future.<
This one has to call for a crazy-bitch slap. As I read this
I thought to myself ---- WHAT ! ?!?!?
This one is so wrong I don’t even know where to start. Is
any client really willing to pay someone for what they THINK MIGHT happen in
the future so I’m going to build your site for that possible event? Sounds a
little crazy when I say it huh?
Anyone who is responsible for promoting anything can only
deal with results. Results today. Having an eye on possible future risks is
prudent, but telling your readers to use this kind of yardstick to measure a
good seo from a fraudster is beyond ridiculous.
“You need to make your site as relevant as possible if you
want ranking in the future” :0 Really, you should be ashamed of claiming this
is a tip for avoiding fraud. Tsk tsk
tsk.
>7. Gimmicks, shady manipulation, and tricks may work in
the short term but are not a legitimate strategy for sites that you really care
about. Also, be careful of over-optimization. Analyzing your top ranked
competitors and trying to imitate their keyword density, weighting, etc. is a
waste of time.<
Again, while I feel you could have done a much better job of
explaining what things like over-optimization and gimmicks are, you still get a
get-out-of-a-bitchslap-free card for this one.
I just wish you would have made it clear that finding
someone who does understand the value of analyzing competitors for a lot of
things other than what you mentioned is an indication of quality consultability.
>8. SEO is going to continue to require more and more
resources to do well. Small SEO budgets are just not going to cut it in
competitive industries in the near future. In spite of that fact, for the
present at least, SEO is still a far better investment than CPC for most
industries.<
You say, “in spite of the fact that SEO will be beyond the
reach of small budgets”, , but the problem is that is NOT a fact. There are a LOT of ways for small budgets to use SEO and SEO
consulting to improve their business and their online presence. I think you are
doing a huge disservice to your readers and to the industry trying to convince
small businesses to not spend their money on SEO when that may provide a
greater value for small businesses than for most corporates.
I assure you I could give about 100 tips that would cost
little more than some time that could improve traffic and/or conversions almost
overnight. THAT is a fact!
So, I’m not upset with you for casting negative perceptions
over an industry that you clearly profit from. I’m not even that upset that you
have offended my friends, colleagues and peers by calling 90% of them thieves
and scam artists. I’m upset because you have the reach and power to advance the
industry that you too are a part of instead of just making the problem worse.
Yet you chose to write something that does damn little to actually provide any
real value and insulting your own peers while doing it. It is hypocritical to
the extreme and I, we all, expect more from you.
Marketing Pilgrim could choose to be a part of the solution
instead of just compounding the problem. I’m calling you out. I’m challenging
you to do more to change the negative perceptions for the better.
I care little what you may say of me, (I’m not expecting
much of anything good after this), but I care a lot about what you do for the
industry. I think you are a smart
company and it seems only smart that you would help to get people to realize that
90% of SEO's are NOT scammers and fraudsters. 90% are smart, hard working
people who can be trusted if you are simply clear of what you really want.
You can do a lot better and like all of us, if you can ---
you should.
Now, I’m not going to just leave it at this. I realize that
all the Guru has done is complain and has not really done much to help the
people who really do want to know how to locate the SEO’s that can actually
help them solve problems.
Tomorrow I leave for 3 days to finally fulfill a life-long
dream of seeing the Taj Mahal. I can’t wait and even though I’m still very weak
from being so sick for so long, I’m as excited as a kid on Chirstmas Eve.
When I return before the end of this week, I am going to
write The SEO Guru’s Tips for finding a good SEO and for those who need to find
someone who can actually help them with search marketing and online promotion,
this is the article you’ve been waiting for.
You kids better turn off that TV and get to bed before I get
in there!
PEACE